Open Projects

Türkçe: README.tr.md

Dashcam-Based Traffic Violation Detection: Extending Enforcement Beyond Fixed Cameras

Summary

Fixed enforcement cameras only see the spot where they are installed. Many of the most dangerous behaviors on the road (unsafe overtaking, lane violations, weaving between lanes, driving on the hard shoulder, tailgating) happen everywhere else. At the same time, many drivers already buy dashcams to have evidence in case of an accident. This proposal turns those dashcams into a road safety network: the traffic police approve selected dashcam models that run a sealed, tamper-proof violation-detection app. The camera keeps recording as usual, recognizes traffic violations, and sends only the relevant evidence (a few still images, time and location) to the traffic police through the driver’s phone connection, where a fine can be issued automatically. To encourage adoption, approved devices are offered to volunteer drivers free of charge or at half price.

Problem

A car with an approved dashcam records a vehicle weaving across a solid line; only a few still images, time and location travel through the driver's phone to the traffic police, while all other footage stays in the car

Proposed Solution

Use the cameras that drivers already want in their cars as a trusted, privacy-respecting extension of traffic enforcement:

  1. Approved devices: the traffic police select and approve specific dashcam models that meet their requirements for image quality, positioning and security.
  2. Sealed detection app: an official violation-detection app, developed or approved by the traffic police, is installed on these devices. The device is closed to modification: the driver cannot alter the app, the recordings or the evidence it produces.
  3. Normal dashcam first: the device keeps doing its normal job of recording the road for the driver’s own protection. Violation detection runs alongside it.
  4. Minimal evidence only: when the app detects a violation, it sends only the relevant still images, the time, the location and the violation type to the traffic police, using the driver’s phone connection. There is no continuous upload. A short video clip of the relevant moment is sent only if the traffic police request it later.
  5. Tamper-evident evidence: every evidence package is sealed by the device so that any later change can be detected. Fake or edited evidence is rejected.
  6. Trust score and human review: each detection carries a confidence level. Detections with high confidence, or the same violation reported independently by more than one vehicle, can be processed automatically. Low-confidence detections go to a traffic officer for review before any fine is issued.
  7. Automatic fines: confirmed violations are processed like fixed-camera violations: the fine is issued and sent to the vehicle owner, with the evidence available for review and appeal.
  8. Incentive for drivers: to make the approved device the natural choice over ordinary dashcams, it is offered to volunteer drivers free of charge or at half price.

How It Works

Step What happens
Driving The approved dashcam records the road like any dashcam; footage stays on the device
Violation seen The sealed app recognizes a violation (for example weaving across a solid line or driving on the hard shoulder)
Evidence package A few still images, time, location and violation type are sealed into a small evidence package
Sending The package travels through the driver’s phone connection to the traffic police; nothing else is uploaded
Checking High-confidence or multi-vehicle corroborated cases are processed automatically; low-confidence cases go to an officer
Fine A confirmed violation leads to a fine sent to the vehicle owner, with evidence available for appeal
Follow-up If needed, the traffic police can request a short clip of that moment only
flowchart TD
    Drive(["Approved dashcam records the road as usual"]) --> Detect{"Violation detected?"}
    Detect -->|No| Stay["Footage stays in the car, nothing is sent"]
    Detect -->|Yes| Pack["Sealed evidence package: still images, time, location, violation type"]
    Pack --> Phone["Sent through the driver's phone connection"]
    Phone --> Trust{"High confidence or reported by more than one vehicle?"}
    Trust -->|Yes| Auto["Processed automatically"]
    Trust -->|No| Officer["Traffic officer reviews the evidence"]
    Officer -->|Confirmed| Auto
    Officer -->|Not confirmed| Drop["Discarded, no fine"]
    Auto --> Fine["Fine sent to the vehicle owner, evidence available for appeal"]
    Fine -.->|"Only if needed"| Clip["Short clip of that moment requested"]

Implementation & Phasing

  1. Standards and approval: the traffic police define the requirements for approved devices and the list of violations the app may detect, together with the data protection authority.
  2. Pilot: a limited number of volunteer drivers on selected roads use approved devices. In this phase every detection is reviewed by an officer, to measure accuracy and tune the trust score.
  3. Automatic processing for clear cases: once accuracy is proven, high-confidence and multi-vehicle corroborated detections are processed automatically, while the rest stay under human review.
  4. Wider rollout: the free or half-price device offer is extended to more volunteers, and additional device models from different manufacturers are approved.
  5. Continuous review: detection accuracy, appeal outcomes and privacy compliance are published and reviewed regularly.

Stakeholders & Benefits

Risks & Mitigations

Risk Mitigation
Wrong fines from false detections Trust score: only high-confidence or multi-vehicle corroborated cases are automatic; everything else is reviewed by an officer; right of appeal with evidence
Manipulated or fake evidence Sealed, tamper-proof devices and tamper-evident evidence packages; approved models only
Privacy of other road users and the driver No continuous upload; only the minimal evidence of a detected violation is sent; all other footage stays in the car; clear retention limits
Drivers see it as spying on each other Voluntary participation, transparent rules, published accuracy and appeal statistics
Data cost for the driver Only small still images are sent; a short clip only when requested
Cost of free or half-price devices Start with a pilot; scale up as road safety results are demonstrated

Keywords: road safety, traffic enforcement, dashcam, traffic violation detection, automated fines, lane violation, tailgating, hard shoulder, evidence integrity, privacy by design

Support This Work

If you find this idea useful, you can support the author’s open work through GitHub Sponsors.

Sponsor merihilgor on GitHub

Origin

Originally proposed by Merih İlgör (July 2026); published here as an open project idea.

License

This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 for non-commercial use; see LICENSE. Commercial use requires a revenue-share agreement; see COMMERCIAL-LICENSE.md. Modified versions may not be sold or transferred to third parties as new ideas, and patent-like rights are reserved; see COMMERCIAL-LICENSE.md.